In Libreria
Sinossi
Nella scena politica e culturale dell'Atene democratica del V-VI secolo a. C. erano venute alla ribalta nuove e ambigue figure di intellettuali, che si proponevano quali maestri a pagamento di formazione politica, retorica e culturale della gioventù. I sofisti costituiscono sin dall'inizio uno dei principali obiettivi polemici di Platone. Già nei primi dialoghi il suo sforzo è volto a differenziare queste figure da Socrate, mettendo in luce la natura ingannevole della loro pretesa sapienza. Ciò porta Platone ad affrontare in modo radicale questioni fondamentali per il pensiero occidentale: come è possibile il falso nel pensiero e nel discorso? E cos'è l'Essere?
- ISBN:
- Casa Editrice:
- Pagine: 264
- Data di uscita: 10-06-2008
Recensioni
By the middle of the book here's what I really wanted to see happen: --- STRANGER: There are some who imitate, knowing what they imitate, and some who do not know. And what line of distinction can there possibly be greater than that which divides ignorance from knowledge? THEAETETUS: There can be no gre Leggi tutto
مكالمه ى سوفيست، به شناخت ماهيت سوفيست مى پردازد. سقراط در اين گفتگو ساكت است و بيگانه اى الئايى صحبت مى كند. خلاصه ى مباحث (view spoiler) [افلاطون ابتدا مى گويد عدم مضاف غير از عدم مطلق است، و عدم مضاف در حقيقت موجود است. سپس بيان مى دارد كه "معرفت خلاف واقع" و "استدلال نادرست" قسمى از عدم مضاف هستند، و در نتيجه وج (hide spoiler)] Leggi tutto
Clearly I’ll have to read this again. I suspect God kills a kitten every time Theaetetus says “clearly” “definitely,” “of course.” BECAUSE NONE OF THAT IS CLEAR AT ALL. I became interested in Sophist through Heidegger. I’ve read a bunch of Plato’s dialogues before, I can’t remember which, I read them Leggi tutto
En este dialogo, del cual Platón toma de la mano al Extranjero, da sentido decisivo a lo que toca a lo esencial de su proyecto filosófico desde su enfoque metodológico hasta su dimensión ontológica. Un dialogo que corresponde al periodo tardío del autor y que tiene como eje central las característic Leggi tutto
Okay I know I know I know, I have said countless time that I don't like Plato and that I don't like dialogues... Apparently, I do like the Sophist... I'm not going to try to go into too much details about why I did like this book in contrast to my general opinion on Plato's dialogue, but I think it h Leggi tutto
O.k. Since now, whenever somebody asks me what's the point of reading Plato after nearly 2500 years, I can laught earnestly. This was a truly extraordinary experience. Plato is quite regardful writer, he makes sure everybody's got the point before he moves on. Trying to define (and succeding in it wh Leggi tutto
Opposites time all the time in this dialogue. Trying to break down in the most tedious line of questions of what is being and what is non being. This dialogue was dragging for a while near the end and then it wraps up without much of a conclusion in a matter of phrases. Certainly didn’t feel conclus Leggi tutto
Citazioni
Al momento non ci sono citazioni, inserisci tu la prima!
